One of the first steps in responding to the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) through pharmacological treatments or non-pharmacological approaches is to detect their occurrence.1 There is a growing consensus that early and ongoing assessment of behaviors can lead to a more effective response. For example, the AMA Performance Dementia Measurement Set recommends that health providers systematically screen for behaviors at a minimum once a year using a standardized assessment tool. It is unclear, however, which assessment tool to use and whether sufficient standardized approaches to ongoing behavioral detection are available from which effective plans for response can be derived. Nevertheless, behavior should be assessed on a frequent, ongoing, and systematic basis so that patterns can be identified that will help inform the design of NPA.
To evaluate the state-of-science concerning behavioral assessments, a comprehensive review of available published measures was conducted and their psychometric properties summarized. A final set of 44 measures were identified, with most having adequate psychometric properties. The majority of measures (n=15) covered a broad range of behaviors and were developed for use in dementia care or in nursing homes. Measures were also found for specific neuropsychiatric symptoms, including agitation, apathy, aggression, depression, anxiety, sleep, and wandering, though these were less likely to be specific for a dementia population. No specific measures were identified separate from the general measures, which addressed behaviors such as euphoria, hallucinations, irritability apart from aggression or anxiety, and/or motor and verbal disturbances. Table 1 lists all 44 measures and their essential properties. Table 2 summarizes the number of measures for each behavioral category considered. Table 3 compares the 44 measures in terms of settings, number of items, and behavioral categories included.
Assessment Tool |
Behavioral Domains1 |
Who Administers and How |
Number of Items |
Response Categories |
Estimated Time to Administer |
Setting and Target Population |
Reliability and Validity |
Part I: General Behavior Scales |
1.Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Non-Cognitive |
Tremors
Pacing
Motor restlessness
Tearfulness
Depression
Delusions
Hallucinations
Appetite
Concentration
Uncooperativeness |
Interview with caregiver and patient |
10 items |
Based on past week
Rated
0 = not present to
5 = severe
Range 0-50
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
|
Not specified |
AD patients in community and nursing homes |
α=.83
Test-retest reliability: r = .977
Significant Correlations with NOSGER Patients Mood subscale (r =.69) social behavior (r=.69) and disturbing behavior (r = .51). p<.05
|
2. Multi-Dimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES) |
Self-care
Disoriented behavior
Depressed/Anxious mood
Irritable behavior
Withdrawn behavior |
Nursing staff with daily contact of person being assessed |
40 items
(5 groups,
8 items each) |
Based on past week
Rated either 1-4 or 1-5 scale with different response sets for each item
Range 40-180
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
|
Not specified |
Older adults in psychiatric facilities, nursing homes, homes for the aged, and continuing care hospitals |
Inter-rater reliability:
Self-care (r=.97)
Disorientation (r=.84)
Depression (r=.58)
Irritability (r=.72)
Withdrawn (r=.75)
Internal Consistency:
Self-care (α=.82)
Disorientation (α=.87)
Depression (α=.80)
Irritability (α=.79)
Withdrawn (α=.78)
Convergent validity:
Correlation with Physical and Mental Impairment of functioning Evaluation subscales significant at p<.001
Self-care (r=.91)
Disorientation (r=.81)
Depression (r=.65)
Irritability (r=.77)
Withdrawn (r=.78)
Depression correlated with Zung Depression Status Inventory (r=.49, p<.005)
Self-care correlated with Robertson Short Mental Status Questionnaire (r=.53, p<.001)
Disorientation with Robertson Short Mental Status Questionnaire (r=.77, p<.001)
|
3. Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER) |
Memory
IADLs
ADLs
Mood
Social behavior
Disturbing behavior |
Nurse/ care-giver obser-vation. Observer contact with person at least 2x/week for min. 2 hours on each occasion. |
30 items
(6 groups, 5 items each) |
Based on observations in the past 2 weeks
Rated
1=no disturbance
to 5=maximum disturbance
Range 30-150
Higher scores = greater behavioral issues
|
Not specified |
Older adults at home or in an institution (healthy, mild dementia and advanced dementia) |
Inter-rater:
Memory (r=.85)
IADL (r=.89)
ADL (r=.88)
Mood (r=.76)
Social behavior (r=.68)
Disturbing behavior (r=.70)
(p<.001 for all subscales)
Retest reliability
Memory (r=.91)
IADL (r=.92)
ADL (r=.88)
Mood (r=.85)
Social behavior (r=.87)
Disturbing behavior (r=.84)
(p<.001 for all subscales)
Concurrent Validity:
Memory
compared measures of cognition (digit span forward and backward, trail-making) (r=.43-.70, p<.001)
IADL compared with ADL and PLUT (r=.60-.68, p<.001)
ADL: compared with IADL and PLUT3 (r=.73-.80, p<.001)
Social behavior compared with PLUT (r=.74, p<.001).
Not done for mood or disturbing behavior
|
4. The Neuro-behavioral Rating Scale (NRS) |
Cognition Agitation/
Disinhibition
Behavioral Retardation Anxiety/Depression
Verbal output disturbance Psychosis |
Structured interview with patient by trained researcher or psychologist/psychiatrist |
27 items |
Rating period not stated
Scored 0=not present to
6=extremely severe
Range 0-162
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
|
45 minutes |
Patients with head trauma, HIV infection and dementia |
Inter-rater reliability: r=.93, p<.001
|
5. The Nursing Home Behavior Problem Scale (NHBPS) |
Uncooperative or aggressive
Irrational or restless
Sleep problems
Annoying
Inappropriate
Dangerous |
Observation by nurses and nursing assistants |
29 items |
Based on past 3 days
Rated
0=never to 4=always
Range 0-116
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues |
3-5 minutes per resident |
Nursing home residents |
Inter-rater reliability:
r=.75-.83
Construct Validity:
Correlation with NOSIE r=-.747
Correlation with CMAI r=.911
|
6. Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) |
Delusions
Hallucinations
Activity disturbances
Aggressiveness
Diurnal rhythm disturbances
Affective disturbance
Anxiety/phobia |
Informant interview |
26 items
(7 groups plus 1 global assessment of the overall magnitude of the symptoms) |
Based on past 2 weeks
Rated 0 = not present to 3 (each category 3 is different)
Range 0-75 (only first 25 items totaled)
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
|
20 minutes |
AD patients; outpatient and nursing home residents |
Interclass correlation coefficient r = .96 (p<.01)
"Construct validity supported by the differences between the nature and course of behavioral symptoms of AD and those of the cognitive and functional symptoms" |
7. Neuro-psychiatric Inventory (NPI)
Also available are the NPI-C and the NPI-Q |
Delusions
Hallucinations
Dysporhia
Anxiety
Agitation
Euphoria
Apathy
Irritability
Disinhibition
Aberrant motor behavior
Nighttime behavior disturbances
Changes in appetite and eating behaviors
(the last 2 were additions to the original)
Caregiver distress |
Caregiver familiar with person with behaviors |
12 items each rated by frequency, severity, and caregiver distress
*number of items depends on version used |
Based on past month
Yes/No to behavior present
Frequency rated
1 = occasionally, less than once per week to
4 = very frequently, once or more per day or continuously
Severity rated
1 = mild, produces little stress in subject to 3 = marked, a major source of behavioral abnormality
Caregiver distress rated
0 = not distressing to
5 = extreme distress
Total score for each domains calculated by multiplying frequency by severity
Add domain totals for total NPI score
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
|
10 minutes but depends on number of behaviors present |
Dementia patients, no specific setting stated |
Content validity: a Delphi panel to review the behaviors of apathy, irritability, disinhibition, and euphoria as there was no "gold standard"
Concurrent validity: scores on relevant scales were compared to the BEHAVE-AD and HAM-D. All correlations reached the .05 level of significance and all but one reached the .01 level of significance.
Reliability: between rater reliability varied from 93.6 to 100%
Test-retest reliability was .79 (p<.01) for frequency and .86 (p<.01) for severity at 3 weeks. |
8. Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) |
Memory-related problems
Depression problems
Disruptive problems
Caregiver Reaction |
Caregiver report |
24 items each rated by frequency and caregiver distress |
Based on past week
Behaviors rated on frequency: 0 = never occurs to 4 = occurs daily or more often
Range 0-96; Higher score = greater frequency of behavioral issues
Caregiver reaction rated by degree behavior is upsetting/bothersome
0 = not at all to 4 = extremely
Range 0-96
Higher scores indicate greater distress
|
15-20 minutes |
Dementia patients in outpatient clinic |
Patient behavior frequency
Overall reliability: .84
Caregiver Reaction
Overall reliability: .90
Validity confirmed through a comparison of scores with well-established indices of depression, cognitive impairment and caregiver burden
All were correlated at a .05 level of significance and all but one at the .01 level of significance.
|
9. Computer Assisted Behavioral Observation Systems (CABOS) |
Disruptive vocalization (but could potentially be applied to other behaviors) |
Direct observation |
12 hours of observation per patient ( 4 three-hour blocks) |
Location
Activity in Environment
Sound in Environment
Social Environment
Physical Restraint |
12 hours per patient |
Nursing home residents with probable dementia |
Kappa reliabilities for interobserver reliability ranged from 1.0 (location-hairdresser) to .67 (activity-transfer) |
10. Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) |
Memory
Orientation
Judgment and
Problem Solving
Community Affairs
Home and hobbies
Personal Care
|
Semi -structured interviews of caregiver and person with AD |
6 Domains |
Rating based on trained interviewers judgment based on semi-structured interview of caregiver and person with AD and
Each domain rated
0 = none to 3 = severe |
40 minutes |
AD patients in the community |
Overall agreement of investigators is 83%.
Criterion validity for both global and individual scores.
Neuropathological Validity in detecting the presence or absence dementia. |
11. Behavioral Syndromes Scale for Dementia (BSSD) |
Disinhibition (including agitation, aggression, and wandering)
Catastrophic reactions
Apathy-indifference
Sundowning
Denial |
Family caregiver |
24 items (5 domains and global scores) |
Based on past week
Rated
0 = no information
to 6 = extreme
Denial rated (0-4)
Global rating for each domain
Higher scores = greater behavioral issues
|
20-30 minutes |
Probable AD in outpatient setting |
Interclass correlation coefficients for the 5 domains:
Catastrophic reactions: .64.-85
Disinhibition: .83-.90
Apathy-indifference:
.65-.85
Sundowning .53-.95
Denial: .40-.84
Internal Consistency of ratings, Cronbach's alpha:
Catastrophic reactions:
.69-.78
Disinhibition: .73-.82
Apathy-indifference:
.82-.83
Sundowning: .70-.76
Divergent Validity was demonstrated by weak to moderate correlations between domains.
Criterion validity was demonstrated in several ways including an association with mMMSE score. |
12. Dementia Signs and Symptoms Scale (DSS) |
Anxiety
Mania
Depression
Restlessness
Social disruptiveness
Aggressiveness
Delusions
Hallucinations |
Semi-structured interview with person with dementia and informant, examiner also rates based on interviews and clinical judgment |
43 items (8 subscales) |
Rating based on occurrence and severity in past month
Rated
0=absent to
3=daily
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
|
30 minutes |
AD patients in clinical settings |
Internal consistency ranged from .37 for hallucinations to .82 for behaviors. Average internal consistency was .60. Interrater reliability was .92-.99.
Pearson correlations ranged from +.49 with the depression scale to +.94 with the mania scale. |
13. CERAD Behavior Rating Scale for Dementia (BRSD) |
Depressive features
Psychotic features
Defective self-regulation
Irritability/agitation
Vegetative features
Apathy
Aggression
Affective Ability
|
Informant interview |
Original 51 items (48 quantitative and 3 open-ended)
Revised 46-item (3 quantitative items dropped and 3 open-ended items consolidated into one question)
17 items shortened version
|
Based on past month
5 items (diurnal patterns of confusion and changes in interest, appetite, weight and sexual drive) scored as present or absent.
Other items rated
0 = has not occurred since illness began to 4 = present 16 days or more in the past month, more than half the days in the month
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
Scoring available for "has occurred since illness began but not in past month" |
20-30 minutes |
Dementia patients in various settings |
Interrater reliability ranged from 91.3% to 100%. Item kappas ranged from .77 to 1.00.
|
14. Key Behavior Change Inventory (KBCI) |
Inattention
Impulsivity
Unawareness of problems
Apathy
Interpersonal difficulties
Communication problems
Somatic difficulties
Emotional adjustment
|
Informant interview |
64 items
(8 subscales, 8 items each) |
Rating period not stated
4-point scale (false not true to very true)
Half of items are worded positively, half negatively
Range of scores not available
Greater score equals greater impairment
|
Not specified. |
traumatic Brain Injury and AD in clinics |
α = .82-.91
Content validity: external item review by panel of experts
Construct validity: significant group differences between controls and those with TBI (F (16,178) = 9.15, p<.001).
|
15. Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale (DBD) |
Passivity
Agitation
Eating disturbances
Aggressiveness
Diurnal rhythm disturbances
Sexual misdemeanor |
Informant interview
|
28 items |
Based on prior week
Rated
0 = never to 4 = all the time
Range 0-112
Higher scores = more disturbance
|
15 minutes |
Dementia patients living in the community |
Internal consistency α=.83-.84
Test-retest: r=.71
Construct validity: correlation with Greene's Behavior and Mood Disturbance Scale r=.73
|
Assessment Tool |
Domains of Behavior |
Who Administers and How |
Number of Items |
Response Categories |
Estimated Time to Administer |
Setting and Target Population |
Reliability and Validity |
Part II: Specific Behavior Scales- Agitation Scales |
16. Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) |
Agitation: physically aggressive, physically non-aggressive, verbally agitated, and hiding/hoarding behaviors |
Informant interview |
29 items
Short form is 14 items
Community form is 37 items
|
Based on prior 2 weeks
Rated
1 = never to 7 = several times in an hour
Range 0-203
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
|
<30 minutes |
Originally designed for Nursing home residents but also used in community settings |
Internal consistency reliability α = 0.86-0.91 based on shift worked.
Interrater reliability for the total score was 0.41.
Pearson product-moment correlations between CMAI and Behave-AD and BSSD range from .0304 - .5177 depending on shift. |
17. Agitated Behavior in Dementia Scale (ABID) |
Agitation |
Informant/caregiver interview |
16 items and caregiver distress |
Frequency rated on past 2 weeks - each week rated separately
Frequency rated
0 = did not occur in the week to 3 = occurred daily or more often
2 weekly scores are added together for a final score on each item of 0 to 6
Range 0-48
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
Caregiver reaction only rated once in 2 weeks
Caregiver reaction rated 0 = not upsetting to 4 = extremely upsetting
Reaction range 0 to 64.
Higher scores indicate greater reaction
|
<20 minutes |
Dementia patients residing in community |
Internal consistency = .70
Test-retest reliability .60-.73
Validity confirmed with correlation to RMBPC (r = .74, p<.0001,), BRSD (r = .65, p <.0001), and the CMAI (r = .62, p<.0001).
|
18. Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (PAS) |
Agitation
4 behavior groups:
Aberrant Vocalization
Motor Agitation
Aggressiveness
Resistance to care |
Direct observation and scoring by trained health professionals |
Frequency and intensity of behavior |
Period of observation ranged from 1 to 8 hours
Scale is 0 to 4: each group has different scoring criteria based on the behavior of interest
Scores are not totaled
|
<5 minutes |
In-patient unit for dementia patients with behavioral problems and nursing home residents with dementia |
Interclass correlation r = +.82-+.93 for total score
Individual item r = +.54 - +.88.
Validity is confirmed by the difference in scores when interventions to reduce agitation were initiated compared to no interventions. |
19. Brief Agitation Rating Scale (BARS) (short-form of Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory) |
Agitation |
Informant Review |
10 items |
Based on prior 2 weeks
Rated 1 = none to
7 = several times a day
Range 10-70
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
|
Not specified. |
Nursing Home residents with dementia |
α = 0.74 to 0.82.
The intra-class correlation r = 0.73.
The score correlated well with a CMAI done on the patient.
|
20. Overt Agitation Severity Scale (OASS) |
Agitation ( 3 domains: Vocalizations and oral/facial movements
Upper torso and upper extremity movements
Lower extremity movements) |
15-minute observation |
12 items
(3 domains)
|
Rated during 15 minute observation period
Intensity in 3 domains scored as 1-4 with each domain having different descriptions of intensity.
Item frequency rated as
0 = not present to 4 = always present
Intensity and frequency are multiplied for each item to give a severity score
Severity scores are totaled for the OASS total score
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
|
15 minutes |
Adult psychiatric patients, including those dementia |
Pearson correlation coefficient (r = .90, p<.01)
Convergent construct validity through strong association with PAS (r = .81, p<.01 for rater 1 and r = .82, p <.01 for rater 2).
Discriminant validity established by low correlation between OASS and OAS (r = .28, p<.01).
|
21. Disruptive Behavior Rating Scales (DBRS) |
Physical aggression
Verbal aggression
Agitation
Wandering
|
Direct observation, chart review, staff report, or patient self-report |
21 items |
Daily for a week
Rated
0 = insufficient data
To 5= behavior occurs and has a severe effect or results in extreme intervention (life-threatening injury)
Range 0-105
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
|
5-10 minutes |
Dementia residents in nursing facilities |
Inter-rater reliability:
Physical aggression (r=.91)
Verbal aggression (r=.83)
Agitation (r=.84)
Wandering (r=.71)
Total (r=.93)
Validity: Total score correlation with nurse's assessment rating for severity (r=.73, p<.001) and with distress (r=.85, p<.001).
|
Assessment Tool |
Domains of Behavior |
Who Administers and How |
Number of Items |
Response Categories |
Estimated Time to Administer |
Setting and Target Population |
Reliability and Validity |
Part III: Specific Behavior Scales-Apathy Scales |
22. Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating Scale (DAIR) |
Apathy |
Structured interview with caregiver |
16 items
Follow-up
question determines
behavioral changes from prior to AD diagnosis
|
Based on past month
Rated 0 = no or almost never
to 3 = Yes, almost always
Only items representing a change in behavior are included in the final apathy score.
Higher scores represent greater apathy.
|
Not specified |
Patients in clinic with probable AD |
Internal consistency: Overall: α=.89
In-person: α=.91 Telephone: α=.94
Test-retest reliability: Assessed using 20 randomly selected
caregivers with assessments on average 56 days apart: r=.85, p<.001
Interrater reliability determined by a second rater's rating of 10 audiotaped interviews: r=1.00, p<.01
Convergent validity: Correlation between apathy score and an independent clinician's blind assessment of apathy: r=.31, p<.05 to .46, p<.01
Criterion validity: Optimal
cut-points and associated sensitivity and specificity not determined.
Discriminant validity: Very poor correlation between apathy score and depression: r=.08.
|
23. Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES)
3 versions: self: AES-S, informant: AES-I, clinician: AES-C
|
Apathy |
Oral interview between trained interviewer and patient |
18 core items
Semi-structured open ended interview also included
|
Based on current functioning or for patients hospitalized within 3-4 days rate based on past 4 weeks
Rated 1 = not at all true/characteristic
to 4 = very true/ characteristic
(3 items are negatively worded and would need to be reversed scored for a total score)
Range 18-72
Lower scores indicate more apathy
|
10-20 minutes |
Adults, 18+ years in various settings |
Internal consistency 0.86-.094
In dementia patients:
AES-C: α=.90
AES-I: α=.90
Test-retest α=.76-.94
Convergent validity: Assessed by
examining the correlation between
the three versions of the AES
(i.e., self, clinician, and informant):
r=.43, p<.01 to .72, p<.01.
Discriminant validity: Assessed by examining the correlation between apathy and depression [for self-rated (r=.43) and
informant-rated (r=.27, p<.01)] and anxiety [for the clinician (r=.35, p<.01) and self-ratings (r=.42)].
In dementia patients the AES-I provided the greatest sensitivity at 92.9%
AES-C 85.7%
AES-S 61.5% |
24. Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) |
Apathy |
Clinician administered interview |
33 items
(9 domains) |
Based on past 4 weeks
Items 1-3 rated
(2 to -2) based on time to reply and number of activities named
Remaining 30 items are rated
-1 to 1.
Range -36 to +36
Higher and more positive score indicating greater severity of apathy.
|
Not specified |
Parkinson's disease patients in the community
|
Internal consistency: α=.80.
Test-retest reliability at 4 months: r=.95
Interrater reliability: (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.98).
The validity of the LARS for assessing the presence and severity of apathy has been demonstrated in patients with PD. Cut-off scores of -15 to -17 showed good sensitivities (0.87-0.94) and specificities (0.87-0.94).
|
25. Irritability-Apathy Scale (IAS) |
Irritability
Apathy
|
Clinician-administered to informant |
10 items
(2 subscales) |
Rated compared to before onset of illness
Irritability Question 1 Rated 1= not at all irritable to 5 = extremely irritable Questions 2 - 5 rated 1 = never to
3 = always
Total possible = 17
Higher scores indicate greater irritability
Apathy Rated1 to 5 with each question having different responses
Total possible = 25
Higher scores indicate greater apathy
|
Not specified |
Patients with AD or Huntington's disease in community |
Internal consistency:
Irritability: α=.82
apathy: α=.78
Test-retest reliability:
Irritability: r = .81
apathy: r=.76
Interrater reliability:
irritability r= 1.00
apathy: r=.85
Discriminant validity: No
Significant correlation between apathy and premorbid traits (i.e., being "good tempered," "bad tempered," "happy" or a "worrier."
Construct validity: IAS apathy subscale differentiated between controls and AD, and
controls and HD (p<.05)
Convergent validity: Irritability score highly associated with Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale (r = .87, p<.001).
|
26. Frontal System Behavior Scale (FrSBe) (formerly the Frontal Lobe Personality Scale)
|
Apathy (14 items)
Disinhibition (15 items)
Executive Dysfunction (17 items) |
Self-rated or by caregiver |
46 items
(3 domains) |
Rating based on pre-illness and current, or just current
Frequency Rated
1 = Almost never to 5 = Almost always,
reversed for positive items
Sub-scores and total score (range 46-230)
Higher score equals more behavioral abnormality
|
10 minutes to administer; 10-15 minutes to score. |
Outpatients with damage to the frontal lobe, TBI, AD, and PD |
Cronbach's alpha ranged from .93 to .95
Construct validity:
Family ratings of patient pre-morbid behavior and post-illness/injury frontal were not highly correlated (r=.30, p=.16) and pre and post scores were significantly different (t=-6.21, p<.-001). |
27. Apathy Inventory (AI) |
Apathy |
Oral interview: caregiver (AI-caregiver) and patient (AI-patient) based versions
|
3 items rated on frequency, severity and intensity
|
Based on change
since onset of the illness also can be used over a specified time period
Items are present or absent
If present,
frequency rated
1 = occasionally,
to 4 = very frequently)
Severity rated
1 = mild to
3 = marked)
The AI-caregiver score range 0-36
Higher score
indicating greater apathy
In the AI-patient interview, patients report presence or absence of 3 AI items
If present, patient rates intensity 1 = mild to 12 = severe
Range 0-36
Higher scores = more severe apathy
|
Not specified |
MCI, Parkinsons and dementia outpatients |
Internal consistency: α=.84
Test-retest reliability (k=0.99, 0.97, and 0.99 for emotional blunting, lack of initiative, and lack of interest respectively, and 0.96 overall)
Interrater reliability (k=0.99)
Construct validity: Correlation between the lack of initiative (r=.23, p<.01) and lack of interest
(r=.63, p<.001) items and the NPI apathy subscale score.
Discriminant validity:
AI caregiver distinguish AD patients and controls, with AD patients having significantly higher score on lack of initiative and global score than control
|
Assessment Tool |
Domains of Behavior |
Who Administers and How |
Number of Items |
Response Categories |
Estimated Time to Administer |
Setting and Target Population |
Reliability and Validity |
Part IV: Specific Behavior Scales- Aggression Scales |
28. Aggressive Behavior Scale (ABS) |
Aggression |
Uses MDS data |
4 items |
Based on the past 7 days.
Frequency rated
0 = behavior not exhibited
to 3 = behavior occurred daily
Range 0-12
Higher scores more frequent aggressive behavior
|
Not specified. |
Nursing home residents or hospital patients |
α= 0.79-0.93
Relationship to CMAI (0.72, p<.001) |
29. Overt Aggression Scale (OAS)
Also available the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) |
Aggression |
Observation |
4 items |
Rated per incident
Severity scale rated 1 = least severe to 4 = most severe
Duration and severity recorded along with intervention used
|
Not specified |
In-patient psychiatric hospitals adults and children, has been used in patients with dementia |
Correlation coefficient = 0.87 |
30. Rating Scale for Aggressive Behavior in the Elderly (RAGE) |
Aggression |
Observation and medical notes |
21 items |
3 day rating period
Frequency rated
0 = never to
3 = more than once every day
Items 18-21 are scored separately
Range 0-61
Higher scores indicate greater aggressive behavior
|
<5 minutes |
Nursing home residents |
α=.89
Test-retest (r=.94, p<.00001)
Interrater (r=.75, p<.004)
Convergent Validity: Highly correlated with CMAI (r=.73, p=.005) and BARS (r=.84, p<.00001).
|
31. Ryden Aggression Scale (RAS)
Also available the RAS-2
|
Physically aggressive behavior
Verbal aggression
Sexual aggression |
Self administered by informant |
25 items |
Based on past year
Frequency Rated
0 = never to
5 = one or more times daily
Range 0 -125
Higher scores indicate greater aggressive behavior
|
20 minutes |
Community and hospital patients with dementia |
Internal consistency α=.88
Test-retest at 8-12 weeks, r = .86.
Inter-rater reliability r = .88
Construct validity:
RAS1 to RAS2 r=.65, p<.001.
Content validity: literature and expert review
|
32. Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia
(CSDD) |
Depression |
Clinician interview with patient and nursing staff/caregiver |
19 items |
Based on week prior except for weight loss, loss of interest, and lack of energy which are evaluated in the past month
Rated 0 = absent to
2 = severe
Range 0-38
Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomatology
|
30 minutes (20 minutes with caregiver and 10 minutes with patient) |
Dementia patients in various settings |
Interrater reliability k = .67
Internal consistency α=.84
Concurrent validity: significant correlation between score on CSDD and Research Diagnostic Criteria for depression diagnosis (r=.83, p<.001)
|
33. Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9) |
Depression |
Interview with patient or self-administered |
9 items |
Based on the past 2 weeks
Rated 0 = not at all
to 3 = nearly every day
Total scores range from 0-27
Higher scores indicated more depressive symptomatology
5 or items scored >= 2 indicates major depression
Maps to DSM-IV
|
5 minutes |
General population in a variety of settings, has been used in patients with dementia |
α=.86-.89
Criterion validity:
trOC analysis found the area under the curve was .95
Construct validity: strong correlation with mental health portion of SF-20 (.73).
|
34. The Dementia Mood Assessment Scale (DMAS) |
Depression (1st 17 items)
Severity of dementia (items 18-24) |
trained Interviewers with input from nursing staff or caregiver |
24 items |
Based on past week
Items 1-17 rate severity of depression
0 = within normal limits to 6 = most severe
Items 18-24 rate severity of dementia 0 = within normal limits to 6 = most severe
Only items 1-17 are considered in the total score
Range 0-102
Higher scores indicate greater depression symptomatology
|
20-30 minutes |
Dementia patients inpatient or outpatient |
Inter-rater reliability:
Depression items: (r=.69-.74, p<.0001)
Other items: (r=.28 (mania) - .77 (functional impairment) p<.01 for all
Reliable in mild to moderate AD but not in severe AD
Construct validity: correlation with Global depression scores (r=.73)
|
35. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) |
Anxiety
Depression |
Self-report |
14 items (2 subscales, 7 items each) |
Based on past week
Scored from 0-3
Specific response wording varies with each item
Total for each subscale ranges from 0-21
Higher scores indicate greater symptoms
|
<10 minutes |
General population in community and hospital settings, has been used in patients with dementia |
Cronbach's Alpha
General population
Depression = .67-.90
Anxiety = .68-.93
Older Adults
Depression = .77
Anxiety = .76
Convergent Validity:
Ranged from .49-.83
Sensitivity and Specificity were found to be approximately .80
|
36. Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) |
Depression
Anxiety
Stress |
Self-report
|
Long-form version:
42 item
(3 scales, 14 items each)
Short-form version:
21 items (3 scales, 7 items each)
|
Based on past week
Rated 0 = Did not apply to me at all
to 3 = Applied to me very much, or most of the time
Scores are summed for each scale (Range 0- 42/scale) Higher scores indicate greater symptoms
|
5-10 minutes (long-form) |
General population in clinical and non-clinical community settings |
Concurrent:
DASS and BAI (r=0.81); DASS and BDI (r=0.74)
α=.91
Long-form subscales Cronbach's alpha:
D=0.97
A=0.92
S=0.95
Short-form subscales Cronbach's alpha:
D=0.94
A=0.87
S=0.91
|
37. Rating Anxiety in Dementia (RAID)
RAID with structured interview also available
|
Anxiety |
Clinician judgment based on interviews with caregiver (formal or informal) and with the person with dementia and chart review |
20 items (6 subgroups)
|
Based on past 2 weeks
Rated 0 = absent to
3 = severe
Range 0-60
>= 11 suggests significant clinical anxiety
|
10-15 minutes |
Persons with dementia in hospitals, nursing homes, and community |
Inter-rater reliability: kappas ranged from .51 to 1 and overall agreement ranged from 82-100%.
Test-retest reliability: kappas ranged from .53-1 and overall agreement ranged from 84-100%
Internal Consistency: α=.83
Content validity: panel of experts and professionals working with older dementia patients
Concurrent validity: correlation with Carer's rating (.73). Only 38 of the 83 participants were able to complete the other measures of anxiety: Clinical Anxiety Scale (.54), Anxiety Status Inventory (.62). All correlations were significant at p<.001. A modified version of the RAID with the depression items removed was compared to the CSDD (.2).
Construct validity: Principal component analysis found a 5 factor structure of 18 items and accounted for 63.8% of variance. KMO = .768.
|
38. Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) |
Anxiety |
Self-report or nurse-administered |
20 items |
Based on past week
Rated 0 (disagree) to 1(agree)
Range 0-20
Scores of >= 9 indicates clinical anxiety symptomatology
|
Not specified. |
Older adults community dwelling and nursing homes, has been used in patients with dementia |
α = 0.91 among normal elderly
α = 0.93 in psychogeriatric sample.
Specificity: 0.84
Sensitivity: 0.75
Area under ROC curve:
0.80 (95% CI 0.64-0.97)
|
39. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) |
Anxiety |
Self-report |
21 items |
Based on past week
Rated 0 = not at all to 3 = severely, it bothered me a lot
Range 0-63
Higher scores indicate greater anxiety
0-21 = low anxiety
22-35 = moderate anxiety
36+ = potential for concern
|
Time to complete: 10 minutes; Time to score: 5 minutes |
General population in community settings |
α= 0.92
Test-retest:
0.75 (df =81); one week interval
Convergent:
Correlation between BAI and HAM-A and HAM-D were 0.51 (df =150) and 0.25 (df =153), respectively.
Discriminate:
Correlation between BAI and CCL-A (0.51, df=151), CCL-D (0.22, df =150), and HS (0.15, df=158)
One study (Weherell & Gatz) found limitations with the use in older adults and another questioned its use in patients with Parkinson's
|
40. The Worry Scale |
Worry |
Patient rated |
8 items |
Rating period not stated
Rated 5 = Always to 1 = Never
2 items are reverse-coded
Range 8-40
Higher scores = greater worry
|
Not specified |
Persons with dementia living in the community |
Internal consistency: α=.85
Construct validity: factor analysis found 1 dimension with factor weights of .448-.776
Concurrent Validity: correlations with State trait Anxiety Inventory (r=.55, p<.0001)
|
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale not included since generally used to assess psychosis in patients with schizophrenia.
Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) are not included since primarily used in patients with schizophrenia.
Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale not included as it is a single item for apathy that does not have any reliability measure.
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale not included because it was first published in 1960 and is no longer considered the gold standard. While it has adequate internal reliability, many of the items do not contribute to depression severity, response options are not optimal ,and the retest reliability is poor. Content validity has also been found to be poor (Bagby, Ryder, Schuller & Marshall, 2004).
The Mini Nutritional Assessment was not included because it does not address behavior. The Nutritional Risk Index and DETERMINE Your Nutritional Health Checklist were not included because they do not address behavior and because validity has not been established.
GDS was not included as at least two studies have found it not to be as reliable and valid in a dementia population as in the general geriatric population (Burke, 1989; Korner, 2006).
CES-D was not included as there was no evidence of reliability and validity in a dementia population.
State/Trait anxiety scale: originally published prior to 1980.
Geriatric Evaluation by Relative's Rating Instrument (GERRI) Schwartz, G. (1983). Development and validation of the Geriatric Evaluation by Relative's Rating Instrument (GERRI). Psychological Reports. 53:479-88-not included because there is no subscale for neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Clinical Assessment of Psychopathology among Elderly Residents (CAPER): Reichenfeld (1992) not included because it does not address specific behaviors of dementia-it is for diagnosis of psychotic disorders. It is also based on psychiatrist interview.