Toolbox::Assessment




Assessment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD)

One of the first steps in responding to the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) through pharmacological treatments or non-pharmacological approaches is to detect their occurrence.1 There is a growing consensus that early and ongoing assessment of behaviors can lead to a more effective response. For example, the AMA Performance Dementia Measurement Set recommends that health providers systematically screen for behaviors at a minimum once a year using a standardized assessment tool. It is unclear, however, which assessment tool to use and whether sufficient standardized approaches to ongoing behavioral detection are available from which effective plans for response can be derived. Nevertheless, behavior should be assessed on a frequent, ongoing, and systematic basis so that patterns can be identified that will help inform the design of NPA.

To evaluate the state-of-science concerning behavioral assessments, a comprehensive review of available published measures was conducted and their psychometric properties summarized. A final set of 44 measures were identified, with most having adequate psychometric properties. The majority of measures (n=15) covered a broad range of behaviors and were developed for use in dementia care or in nursing homes. Measures were also found for specific neuropsychiatric symptoms, including agitation, apathy, aggression, depression, anxiety, sleep, and wandering, though these were less likely to be specific for a dementia population. No specific measures were identified separate from the general measures, which addressed behaviors such as euphoria, hallucinations, irritability apart from aggression or anxiety, and/or motor and verbal disturbances. Table 1 lists all 44 measures and their essential properties. Table 2 summarizes the number of measures for each behavioral category considered. Table 3 compares the 44 measures in terms of settings, number of items, and behavioral categories included.

1Note: For any resident who exhibits an acute and fluctuating change in behavior, an initial assessment for delirium should be made to rule out the presence of acute medical conditions. Two recent systematic reviews of instruments to detect delirium may be useful to staff trained in their administration:

  • Morandi, A., McCurley, J., Vasilevskis, E., et al. Tools to detect delirium superimposed on dementia: A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2012;60:2005-2012.

  • Wong, C., Holroyd-Leduc, J., Simel, D., et al. Does this patient have delirium? Value of bedside instruments.Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;304:779-786



Table 1. A Systematic Review of Measures of Behaviors for Use with Dementia Patients

back to top
Assessment Tool Behavioral Domains1 Who Administers and How Number of Items Response Categories Estimated Time to Administer Setting and Target Population Reliability and Validity
Part I: General Behavior Scales
1.Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Non-Cognitive Tremors Pacing Motor restlessness Tearfulness Depression Delusions Hallucinations Appetite Concentration Uncooperativeness Interview with caregiver and patient 10 items Based on past week

Rated
0 = not present to
5 = severe

Range 0-50
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
Not specified AD patients in community and nursing homes α=.83

Test-retest reliability: r = .977

Significant Correlations with NOSGER Patients Mood subscale (r =.69) social behavior (r=.69) and disturbing behavior (r = .51). p<.05
2. Multi-Dimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects (MOSES) Self-care Disoriented behavior Depressed/Anxious mood Irritable behavior Withdrawn behavior Nursing staff with daily contact of person being assessed 40 items (5 groups, 8 items each) Based on past week

Rated either 1-4 or 1-5 scale with different response sets for each item

Range 40-180
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
Not specified Older adults in psychiatric facilities, nursing homes, homes for the aged, and continuing care hospitals Inter-rater reliability:
Self-care (r=.97)
Disorientation (r=.84)
Depression (r=.58)
Irritability (r=.72)
Withdrawn (r=.75)

Internal Consistency:
Self-care (α=.82)
Disorientation (α=.87)
Depression (α=.80)
Irritability (α=.79)
Withdrawn (α=.78)

Convergent validity:
Correlation with Physical and Mental Impairment of functioning Evaluation subscales significant at p<.001 Self-care (r=.91)
Disorientation (r=.81)
Depression (r=.65)
Irritability (r=.77)
Withdrawn (r=.78)

Depression correlated with Zung Depression Status Inventory (r=.49, p<.005)
Self-care correlated with Robertson Short Mental Status Questionnaire (r=.53, p<.001)
Disorientation with Robertson Short Mental Status Questionnaire (r=.77, p<.001)
3. Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER) Memory IADLs ADLs Mood Social behavior Disturbing behavior Nurse/ care-giver obser-vation. Observer contact with person at least 2x/week for min. 2 hours on each occasion. 30 items (6 groups, 5 items each) Based on observations in the past 2 weeks

Rated
1=no disturbance
to 5=maximum disturbance

Range 30-150
Higher scores = greater behavioral issues
Not specified Older adults at home or in an institution (healthy, mild dementia and advanced dementia) Inter-rater:
Memory (r=.85)
IADL (r=.89)
ADL (r=.88)
Mood (r=.76)
Social behavior (r=.68)
Disturbing behavior (r=.70)
(p<.001 for all subscales)
Retest reliability
Memory (r=.91)
IADL (r=.92)
ADL (r=.88)
Mood (r=.85)
Social behavior (r=.87)
Disturbing behavior (r=.84)
(p<.001 for all subscales)

Concurrent Validity:
Memory
compared measures of cognition (digit span forward and backward, trail-making) (r=.43-.70, p<.001)
IADL compared with ADL and PLUT (r=.60-.68, p<.001)
ADL: compared with IADL and PLUT3 (r=.73-.80, p<.001)
Social behavior compared with PLUT (r=.74, p<.001).
Not done for mood or disturbing behavior
4. The Neuro-behavioral Rating Scale (NRS) Cognition Agitation/ Disinhibition Behavioral Retardation Anxiety/Depression Verbal output disturbance Psychosis Structured interview with patient by trained researcher or psychologist/psychiatrist 27 items Rating period not stated

Scored 0=not present to
6=extremely severe
Range 0-162
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
45 minutes Patients with head trauma, HIV infection and dementia Inter-rater reliability: r=.93, p<.001
5. The Nursing Home Behavior Problem Scale (NHBPS) Uncooperative or aggressive Irrational or restless Sleep problems Annoying Inappropriate Dangerous Observation by nurses and nursing assistants 29 items Based on past 3 days

Rated
0=never to 4=always

Range 0-116
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
3-5 minutes per resident Nursing home residents Inter-rater reliability:
r=.75-.83

Construct Validity:
Correlation with NOSIE r=-.747
Correlation with CMAI r=.911
6. Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) Delusions Hallucinations Activity disturbances Aggressiveness Diurnal rhythm disturbances Affective disturbance Anxiety/phobia Informant interview 26 items (7 groups plus 1 global assessment of the overall magnitude of the symptoms) Based on past 2 weeks

Rated 0 = not present to 3 (each category 3 is different)

Range 0-75 (only first 25 items totaled)
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
20 minutes AD patients; outpatient and nursing home residents Interclass correlation coefficient r = .96 (p<.01) "Construct validity supported by the differences between the nature and course of behavioral symptoms of AD and those of the cognitive and functional symptoms"
7. Neuro-psychiatric Inventory (NPI) Also available are the NPI-C and the NPI-Q Delusions
Hallucinations
Dysporhia
Anxiety
Agitation
Euphoria
Apathy
Irritability
Disinhibition
Aberrant motor behavior
Nighttime behavior disturbances
Changes in appetite and eating behaviors
(the last 2 were additions to the original)
Caregiver distress
Caregiver familiar with person with behaviors 12 items each rated by frequency, severity, and caregiver distress *number of items depends on version used Based on past month

Yes/No to behavior present
Frequency rated
1 = occasionally, less than once per week to
4 = very frequently, once or more per day or continuously

Severity rated
1 = mild, produces little stress in subject to 3 = marked, a major source of behavioral abnormality

Caregiver distress rated
0 = not distressing to
5 = extreme distress

Total score for each domains calculated by multiplying frequency by severity
Add domain totals for total NPI score
Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
10 minutes but depends on number of behaviors present Dementia patients, no specific setting stated Content validity: a Delphi panel to review the behaviors of apathy, irritability, disinhibition, and euphoria as there was no "gold standard"

Concurrent validity: scores on relevant scales were compared to the BEHAVE-AD and HAM-D. All correlations reached the .05 level of significance and all but one reached the .01 level of significance.

Reliability: between rater reliability varied from 93.6 to 100%
Test-retest reliability was .79 (p<.01) for frequency and .86 (p<.01) for severity at 3 weeks.
8. Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist (RMBPC) Memory-related problems Depression problems Disruptive problems Caregiver Reaction Caregiver report 24 items each rated by frequency and caregiver distress Based on past week

Behaviors rated on frequency: 0 = never occurs to 4 = occurs daily or more often

Range 0-96; Higher score = greater frequency of behavioral issues
Caregiver reaction rated by degree behavior is upsetting/bothersome
0 = not at all to 4 = extremely

Range 0-96
Higher scores indicate greater distress
15-20 minutes Dementia patients in outpatient clinic Patient behavior frequency
Overall reliability: .84

Caregiver Reaction
Overall reliability: .90
Validity confirmed through a comparison of scores with well-established indices of depression, cognitive impairment and caregiver burden
All were correlated at a .05 level of significance and all but one at the .01 level of significance.
9. Computer Assisted Behavioral Observation Systems (CABOS) Disruptive vocalization (but could potentially be applied to other behaviors) Direct observation 12 hours of observation per patient ( 4 three-hour blocks) Location Activity in Environment Sound in Environment Social Environment Physical Restraint 12 hours per patient Nursing home residents with probable dementia Kappa reliabilities for interobserver reliability ranged from 1.0 (location-hairdresser) to .67 (activity-transfer)
10. Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR) Memory Orientation Judgment and Problem Solving Community Affairs Home and hobbies Personal Care Semi -structured interviews of caregiver and person with AD 6 Domains Rating based on trained interviewers judgment based on semi-structured interview of caregiver and person with AD and Each domain rated 0 = none to 3 = severe 40 minutes AD patients in the community Overall agreement of investigators is 83%.

Criterion validity for both global and individual scores.

Neuropathological Validity in detecting the presence or absence dementia.
11. Behavioral Syndromes Scale for Dementia (BSSD) Disinhibition (including agitation, aggression, and wandering) Catastrophic reactions Apathy-indifference Sundowning Denial Family caregiver 24 items (5 domains and global scores) Based on past week

Rated
0 = no information
to 6 = extreme
Denial rated (0-4)

Global rating for each domain

Higher scores = greater behavioral issues
20-30 minutes Probable AD in outpatient setting Interclass correlation coefficients for the 5 domains:

Catastrophic reactions: .64.-85
Disinhibition: .83-.90
Apathy-indifference:
.65-.85
Sundowning .53-.95
Denial: .40-.84

Internal Consistency of ratings, Cronbach's alpha:
Catastrophic reactions:
.69-.78
Disinhibition: .73-.82
Apathy-indifference:
.82-.83
Sundowning: .70-.76
Divergent Validity was demonstrated by weak to moderate correlations between domains.

Criterion validity was demonstrated in several ways including an association with mMMSE score.
12. Dementia Signs and Symptoms Scale (DSS) Anxiety Mania Depression Restlessness Social disruptiveness Aggressiveness Delusions Hallucinations Semi-structured interview with person with dementia and informant, examiner also rates based on interviews and clinical judgment 43 items (8 subscales) Rating based on occurrence and severity in past month

Rated
0=absent to
3=daily

Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues
30 minutes AD patients in clinical settings Internal consistency ranged from .37 for hallucinations to .82 for behaviors. Average internal consistency was .60. Interrater reliability was .92-.99. Pearson correlations ranged from +.49 with the depression scale to +.94 with the mania scale.
13. CERAD Behavior Rating Scale for Dementia (BRSD) Depressive features Psychotic features Defective self-regulation Irritability/agitation Vegetative features Apathy Aggression Affective Ability Informant interview Original 51 items (48 quantitative and 3 open-ended)

Revised 46-item (3 quantitative items dropped and 3 open-ended items consolidated into one question)

17 items shortened version
Based on past month 5 items (diurnal patterns of confusion and changes in interest, appetite, weight and sexual drive) scored as present or absent. Other items rated 0 = has not occurred since illness began to 4 = present 16 days or more in the past month, more than half the days in the month Higher scores indicate greater behavioral issues Scoring available for "has occurred since illness began but not in past month" 20-30 minutes Dementia patients in various settings Interrater reliability ranged from 91.3% to 100%. Item kappas ranged from .77 to 1.00.
14. Key Behavior Change Inventory (KBCI) Inattention Impulsivity Unawareness of problems Apathy Interpersonal difficulties Communication problems Somatic difficulties Emotional adjustment Informant interview 64 items (8 subscales, 8 items each) Rating period not stated

4-point scale (false not true to very true)

Half of items are worded positively, half negatively

Range of scores not available
Greater score equals greater impairment
Not specified. traumatic Brain Injury and AD in clinics α = .82-.91

Content validity: external item review by panel of experts

Construct validity: significant group differences between controls and those with TBI (F (16,178) = 9.15, p<.001).
15. Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale (DBD) Passivity Agitation Eating disturbances Aggressiveness Diurnal rhythm disturbances Sexual misdemeanor Informant interview 28 items Based on prior week

Rated
0 = never to 4 = all the time
Range 0-112
Higher scores = more disturbance
15 minutes Dementia patients living in the community Internal consistency α=.83-.84

Test-retest: r=.71

Construct validity: correlation with Greene's Behavior and Mood Disturbance Scale r=.73

back to top
Assessment Tool Domains of Behavior Who Administers and How Number of Items Response Categories Estimated Time to Administer Setting and Target Population Reliability and Validity
Part II: Specific Behavior Scales- Agitation Scales
16. Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) Agitation: physically aggressive, physically non-aggressive, verbally agitated, and hiding/hoarding behaviors Informant interview 29 items

Short form is 14 items

Community form is 37 items
Based on prior 2 weeks

Rated
1 = never to 7 = several times in an hour

Range 0-203
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
<30 minutes Originally designed for Nursing home residents but also used in community settings Internal consistency reliability α = 0.86-0.91 based on shift worked.

Interrater reliability for the total score was 0.41.

Pearson product-moment correlations between CMAI and Behave-AD and BSSD range from .0304 - .5177 depending on shift.
17. Agitated Behavior in Dementia Scale (ABID) Agitation Informant/caregiver interview 16 items and caregiver distress Frequency rated on past 2 weeks - each week rated separately

Frequency rated
0 = did not occur in the week to 3 = occurred daily or more often

2 weekly scores are added together for a final score on each item of 0 to 6
Range 0-48
Higher scores indicate greater agitation

Caregiver reaction only rated once in 2 weeks

Caregiver reaction rated 0 = not upsetting to 4 = extremely upsetting

Reaction range 0 to 64.
Higher scores indicate greater reaction
<20 minutes Dementia patients residing in community Internal consistency = .70

Test-retest reliability .60-.73

Validity confirmed with correlation to RMBPC (r = .74, p<.0001,), BRSD (r = .65, p <.0001), and the CMAI (r = .62, p<.0001).
18. Pittsburgh Agitation Scale (PAS) Agitation 4 behavior groups: Aberrant Vocalization Motor Agitation Aggressiveness Resistance to care Direct observation and scoring by trained health professionals Frequency and intensity of behavior Period of observation ranged from 1 to 8 hours

Scale is 0 to 4: each group has different scoring criteria based on the behavior of interest

Scores are not totaled
<5 minutes In-patient unit for dementia patients with behavioral problems and nursing home residents with dementia Interclass correlation r = +.82-+.93 for total score

Individual item r = +.54 - +.88.

Validity is confirmed by the difference in scores when interventions to reduce agitation were initiated compared to no interventions.
19. Brief Agitation Rating Scale (BARS) (short-form of Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory) Agitation Informant Review 10 items Based on prior 2 weeks

Rated 1 = none to
7 = several times a day

Range 10-70
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
Not specified. Nursing Home residents with dementia α = 0.74 to 0.82.
The intra-class correlation r = 0.73.
The score correlated well with a CMAI done on the patient.
20. Overt Agitation Severity Scale (OASS) Agitation ( 3 domains: Vocalizations and oral/facial movements Upper torso and upper extremity movements Lower extremity movements) 15-minute observation 12 items (3 domains) Rated during 15 minute observation period

Intensity in 3 domains scored as 1-4 with each domain having different descriptions of intensity.

Item frequency rated as
0 = not present to 4 = always present

Intensity and frequency are multiplied for each item to give a severity score
Severity scores are totaled for the OASS total score
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
15 minutes Adult psychiatric patients, including those dementia Pearson correlation coefficient (r = .90, p<.01)

Convergent construct validity through strong association with PAS (r = .81, p<.01 for rater 1 and r = .82, p <.01 for rater 2).

Discriminant validity established by low correlation between OASS and OAS (r = .28, p<.01).
21. Disruptive Behavior Rating Scales (DBRS) Physical aggression Verbal aggression Agitation Wandering Direct observation, chart review, staff report, or patient self-report 21 items Daily for a week

Rated
0 = insufficient data
To 5= behavior occurs and has a severe effect or results in extreme intervention (life-threatening injury)

Range 0-105
Higher scores indicate greater agitation
5-10 minutes Dementia residents in nursing facilities Inter-rater reliability:
Physical aggression (r=.91)
Verbal aggression (r=.83)
Agitation (r=.84)
Wandering (r=.71)
Total (r=.93)
Validity: Total score correlation with nurse's assessment rating for severity (r=.73, p<.001) and with distress (r=.85, p<.001).

back to top
Assessment Tool Domains of Behavior Who Administers and How Number of Items Response Categories Estimated Time to Administer Setting and Target Population Reliability and Validity
Part III: Specific Behavior Scales-Apathy Scales
22. Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating Scale (DAIR) Apathy Structured interview with caregiver 16 items
Follow-up
question determines
behavioral changes from prior to AD diagnosis
Based on past month

Rated 0 = no or almost never
to 3 = Yes, almost always

Only items representing a change in behavior are included in the final apathy score.
Higher scores represent greater apathy.
Not specified Patients in clinic with probable AD Internal consistency: Overall: α=.89
In-person: α=.91 Telephone: α=.94
Test-retest reliability: Assessed using 20 randomly selected
caregivers with assessments on average 56 days apart: r=.85, p<.001
Interrater reliability determined by a second rater's rating of 10 audiotaped interviews: r=1.00, p<.01

Convergent validity: Correlation between apathy score and an independent clinician's blind assessment of apathy: r=.31, p<.05 to .46, p<.01

Criterion validity: Optimal
cut-points and associated sensitivity and specificity not determined.
Discriminant validity: Very poor correlation between apathy score and depression: r=.08.
23. Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) 3 versions: self: AES-S, informant: AES-I, clinician: AES-C Apathy Oral interview between trained interviewer and patient 18 core items
Semi-structured open ended interview also included
Based on current functioning or for patients hospitalized within 3-4 days rate based on past 4 weeks Rated 1 = not at all true/characteristic to 4 = very true/ characteristic (3 items are negatively worded and would need to be reversed scored for a total score) Range 18-72 Lower scores indicate more apathy 10-20 minutes Adults, 18+ years in various settings Internal consistency 0.86-.094
In dementia patients:
AES-C: α=.90
AES-I: α=.90

Test-retest α=.76-.94
Convergent validity: Assessed by
examining the correlation between
the three versions of the AES
(i.e., self, clinician, and informant):
r=.43, p<.01 to .72, p<.01.

Discriminant validity: Assessed by examining the correlation between apathy and depression [for self-rated (r=.43) and informant-rated (r=.27, p<.01)] and anxiety [for the clinician (r=.35, p<.01) and self-ratings (r=.42)]. In dementia patients the AES-I provided the greatest sensitivity at 92.9% AES-C 85.7% AES-S 61.5%
24. Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) Apathy Clinician administered interview 33 items (9 domains) Based on past 4 weeks

Items 1-3 rated
(2 to -2) based on time to reply and number of activities named
Remaining 30 items are rated
-1 to 1.

Range -36 to +36
Higher and more positive score indicating greater severity of apathy.
Not specified Parkinson's disease patients in the community Internal consistency: α=.80.

Test-retest reliability at 4 months: r=.95

Interrater reliability: (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.98).

The validity of the LARS for assessing the presence and severity of apathy has been demonstrated in patients with PD. Cut-off scores of -15 to -17 showed good sensitivities (0.87-0.94) and specificities (0.87-0.94).
25. Irritability-Apathy Scale (IAS) Irritability Apathy Clinician-administered to informant 10 items (2 subscales) Rated compared to before onset of illness

Irritability Question 1 Rated 1= not at all irritable to 5 = extremely irritable Questions 2 - 5 rated 1 = never to 3 = always

Total possible = 17
Higher scores indicate greater irritability
Apathy Rated1 to 5 with each question having different responses
Total possible = 25
Higher scores indicate greater apathy
Not specified Patients with AD or Huntington's disease in community Internal consistency:
Irritability: α=.82
apathy: α=.78

Test-retest reliability:
Irritability: r = .81
apathy: r=.76

Interrater reliability:
irritability r= 1.00
apathy: r=.85

Discriminant validity: No
Significant correlation between apathy and premorbid traits (i.e., being "good tempered," "bad tempered," "happy" or a "worrier."
Construct validity: IAS apathy subscale differentiated between controls and AD, and controls and HD (p<.05)
Convergent validity: Irritability score highly associated with Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale (r = .87, p<.001).
26. Frontal System Behavior Scale (FrSBe) (formerly the Frontal Lobe Personality Scale) Apathy (14 items) Disinhibition (15 items) Executive Dysfunction (17 items) Self-rated or by caregiver 46 items (3 domains) Rating based on pre-illness and current, or just current

Frequency Rated
1 = Almost never to 5 = Almost always,
reversed for positive items
Sub-scores and total score (range 46-230)
Higher score equals more behavioral abnormality
10 minutes to administer; 10-15 minutes to score. Outpatients with damage to the frontal lobe, TBI, AD, and PD Cronbach's alpha ranged from .93 to .95

Construct validity: Family ratings of patient pre-morbid behavior and post-illness/injury frontal were not highly correlated (r=.30, p=.16) and pre and post scores were significantly different (t=-6.21, p<.-001).
27. Apathy Inventory (AI) Apathy Oral interview: caregiver (AI-caregiver) and patient (AI-patient) based versions 3 items rated on frequency, severity and intensity Based on change
since onset of the illness also can be used over a specified time period

Items are present or absent

If present,
frequency rated
1 = occasionally,
to 4 = very frequently)
Severity rated
1 = mild to
3 = marked)

The AI-caregiver score range 0-36
Higher score
indicating greater apathy

In the AI-patient interview, patients report presence or absence of 3 AI items

If present, patient rates intensity 1 = mild to 12 = severe
Range 0-36
Higher scores = more severe apathy
Not specified MCI, Parkinsons and dementia outpatients Internal consistency: α=.84
Test-retest reliability (k=0.99, 0.97, and 0.99 for emotional blunting, lack of initiative, and lack of interest respectively, and 0.96 overall)

Interrater reliability (k=0.99)

Construct validity: Correlation between the lack of initiative (r=.23, p<.01) and lack of interest (r=.63, p<.001) items and the NPI apathy subscale score.

Discriminant validity:
AI caregiver distinguish AD patients and controls, with AD patients having significantly higher score on lack of initiative and global score than control

back to top
Assessment Tool Domains of Behavior Who Administers and How Number of Items Response Categories Estimated Time to Administer Setting and Target Population Reliability and Validity
Part IV: Specific Behavior Scales- Aggression Scales
28. Aggressive Behavior Scale (ABS) Aggression Uses MDS data 4 items Based on the past 7 days.

Frequency rated
0 = behavior not exhibited
to 3 = behavior occurred daily

Range 0-12
Higher scores more frequent aggressive behavior
Not specified. Nursing home residents or hospital patients α= 0.79-0.93 Relationship to CMAI (0.72, p<.001)
29. Overt Aggression Scale (OAS) Also available the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) Aggression Observation 4 items Rated per incident

Severity scale rated 1 = least severe to 4 = most severe

Duration and severity recorded along with intervention used

Not specified In-patient psychiatric hospitals adults and children, has been used in patients with dementia Correlation coefficient = 0.87
30. Rating Scale for Aggressive Behavior in the Elderly (RAGE) Aggression Observation and medical notes 21 items 3 day rating period

Frequency rated
0 = never to
3 = more than once every day

Items 18-21 are scored separately

Range 0-61
Higher scores indicate greater aggressive behavior
<5 minutes Nursing home residents α=.89

Test-retest (r=.94, p<.00001)

Interrater (r=.75, p<.004)

Convergent Validity: Highly correlated with CMAI (r=.73, p=.005) and BARS (r=.84, p<.00001).
31. Ryden Aggression Scale (RAS)

Also available the RAS-2
Physically aggressive behavior Verbal aggression Sexual aggression Self administered by informant 25 items Based on past year

Frequency Rated
0 = never to
5 = one or more times daily

Range 0 -125
Higher scores indicate greater aggressive behavior
20 minutes Community and hospital patients with dementia Internal consistency α=.88
Test-retest at 8-12 weeks, r = .86.
Inter-rater reliability r = .88

Construct validity:
RAS1 to RAS2 r=.65, p<.001.
Content validity: literature and expert review
32. Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Depression Clinician interview with patient and nursing staff/caregiver 19 items Based on week prior except for weight loss, loss of interest, and lack of energy which are evaluated in the past month

Rated 0 = absent to
2 = severe

Range 0-38
Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomatology
30 minutes (20 minutes with caregiver and 10 minutes with patient) Dementia patients in various settings Interrater reliability k = .67

Internal consistency α=.84

Concurrent validity: significant correlation between score on CSDD and Research Diagnostic Criteria for depression diagnosis (r=.83, p<.001)
33. Patient Health Questionnaire -9 (PHQ-9) Depression Interview with patient or self-administered 9 items Based on the past 2 weeks

Rated 0 = not at all
to 3 = nearly every day

Total scores range from 0-27
Higher scores indicated more depressive symptomatology
5 or items scored >= 2 indicates major depression

Maps to DSM-IV
5 minutes General population in a variety of settings, has been used in patients with dementia α=.86-.89

Criterion validity:
trOC analysis found the area under the curve was .95

Construct validity: strong correlation with mental health portion of SF-20 (.73).
34. The Dementia Mood Assessment Scale (DMAS) Depression (1st 17 items) Severity of dementia (items 18-24) trained Interviewers with input from nursing staff or caregiver 24 items Based on past week

Items 1-17 rate severity of depression
0 = within normal limits to 6 = most severe

Items 18-24 rate severity of dementia 0 = within normal limits to 6 = most severe

Only items 1-17 are considered in the total score
Range 0-102
Higher scores indicate greater depression symptomatology
20-30 minutes Dementia patients inpatient or outpatient Inter-rater reliability:
Depression items: (r=.69-.74, p<.0001)
Other items: (r=.28 (mania) - .77 (functional impairment) p<.01 for all

Reliable in mild to moderate AD but not in severe AD

Construct validity: correlation with Global depression scores (r=.73)
35. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Depression Self-report 14 items (2 subscales, 7 items each) Based on past week

Scored from 0-3
Specific response wording varies with each item

Total for each subscale ranges from 0-21
Higher scores indicate greater symptoms
<10 minutes General population in community and hospital settings, has been used in patients with dementia Cronbach's Alpha
General population
Depression = .67-.90
Anxiety = .68-.93

Older Adults
Depression = .77
Anxiety = .76

Convergent Validity:
Ranged from .49-.83

Sensitivity and Specificity were found to be approximately .80
36. Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) Depression Anxiety Stress Self-report Long-form version:
42 item
(3 scales, 14 items each)

Short-form version:
21 items (3 scales, 7 items each)
Based on past week

Rated 0 = Did not apply to me at all
to 3 = Applied to me very much, or most of the time

Scores are summed for each scale (Range 0- 42/scale) Higher scores indicate greater symptoms
5-10 minutes (long-form) General population in clinical and non-clinical community settings Concurrent:
DASS and BAI (r=0.81); DASS and BDI (r=0.74)

α=.91

Long-form subscales Cronbach's alpha:
D=0.97
A=0.92
S=0.95

Short-form subscales Cronbach's alpha:
D=0.94
A=0.87
S=0.91
37. Rating Anxiety in Dementia (RAID)

RAID with structured interview also available
Anxiety Clinician judgment based on interviews with caregiver (formal or informal) and with the person with dementia and chart review 20 items (6 subgroups) Based on past 2 weeks

Rated 0 = absent to
3 = severe

Range 0-60

>= 11 suggests significant clinical anxiety
10-15 minutes Persons with dementia in hospitals, nursing homes, and community Inter-rater reliability: kappas ranged from .51 to 1 and overall agreement ranged from 82-100%.

Test-retest reliability: kappas ranged from .53-1 and overall agreement ranged from 84-100%

Internal Consistency: α=.83

Content validity: panel of experts and professionals working with older dementia patients

Concurrent validity: correlation with Carer's rating (.73). Only 38 of the 83 participants were able to complete the other measures of anxiety: Clinical Anxiety Scale (.54), Anxiety Status Inventory (.62). All correlations were significant at p<.001. A modified version of the RAID with the depression items removed was compared to the CSDD (.2).

Construct validity: Principal component analysis found a 5 factor structure of 18 items and accounted for 63.8% of variance. KMO = .768.
38. Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI) Anxiety Self-report or nurse-administered 20 items Based on past week

Rated 0 (disagree) to 1(agree)

Range 0-20
Scores of >= 9 indicates clinical anxiety symptomatology
Not specified. Older adults community dwelling and nursing homes, has been used in patients with dementia α = 0.91 among normal elderly

α = 0.93 in psychogeriatric sample.

Specificity: 0.84

Sensitivity: 0.75

Area under ROC curve:
0.80 (95% CI 0.64-0.97)
39. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) Anxiety Self-report 21 items Based on past week

Rated 0 = not at all to 3 = severely, it bothered me a lot

Range 0-63
Higher scores indicate greater anxiety
0-21 = low anxiety
22-35 = moderate anxiety
36+ = potential for concern
Time to complete: 10 minutes; Time to score: 5 minutes General population in community settings α= 0.92

Test-retest:
0.75 (df =81); one week interval

Convergent:
Correlation between BAI and HAM-A and HAM-D were 0.51 (df =150) and 0.25 (df =153), respectively.

Discriminate:
Correlation between BAI and CCL-A (0.51, df=151), CCL-D (0.22, df =150), and HS (0.15, df=158)

One study (Weherell & Gatz) found limitations with the use in older adults and another questioned its use in patients with Parkinson's
40. The Worry Scale Worry Patient rated 8 items Rating period not stated
Rated 5 = Always to 1 = Never

2 items are reverse-coded

Range 8-40
Higher scores = greater worry
Not specified Persons with dementia living in the community Internal consistency: α=.85

Construct validity: factor analysis found 1 dimension with factor weights of .448-.776

Concurrent Validity: correlations with State trait Anxiety Inventory (r=.55, p<.0001)

back to top
Assessment Tool Domains of Behavior Who Administers and How Number of Items Response Categories Estimated Time to Administer Setting and Target Population Reliability and Validity
Part V: Specific Behavior Scales-Sleep Scales
41. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Sleep quality Sleep latency Sleep duration Habitual sleep efficiency Sleep disturbances Use of sleep medications Daytime dysfunction Self-rated or patient interview 19-items self-rated 5-items rated by bedpartner or roommate are part of the original scale but are not included in the scoring Based on past month

First 4 items ask for time or amount of sleep

Items 5-18 items rated 0 = not in the past month to 3 = three or more times a week

1 global item rated
0 = very good to
3 = very bad
Scoring is done in 7 components and then all components are totaled. Scores can range from 0 to 21 A score of 5+ indicates poor sleeper
5-10 minutes for subject to complete; 5 minutes to score General population in all health care settings, has been used with patients with dementia α=.83

Test-retest: no difference found (t=2.32, p=.03)

Sensitivity 89.6%, specificity 86.5% (kappa=.75, p<.001) in distinguishing good and poor sleepers
42. The Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Sleep Informant interview 7 items rated by frequency, severity and caregiver distress Based on past 2 weeks

Frequency rated
0 = not present to
4 = once or more per day (every night)

Severity rated 0 = not present to 3 = marked
Caregiver Distress rated 0 = not at all to 5 = very severely/extremely

Avg. Frequency and avg. severity scores are multiplied to calculated total score

Range 0-12

Higher scores indicated more sleep disturbance
Not specified AD patients in community and living with caregiver Content validity: correlation with NPI sleep subscale r=.341, p<.05
43. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Daytime sleepiness Patient or informant interview 8 items Based on recent times (no exact period given)

Rated 0 = no chance of dozing to
3 = high chance of dozing

Range 0-24
Higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness

Scores of >= 10 indicate above normal daytime sleepiness
Not specified General population in any health care setting, has been used in studies of people with dementia Internal consistency α=.74-.88

back to top
Assessment Tool Domains of Behavior Who Administers and How Number of Items Response Categories Estimated Time to Administer Setting and Target Population Reliability and Validity
Part VI: Specific Behavior Scales-Wandering Scales
44. Algase Wandering Scale (AWS) Also available is the AWS (V2) Wandering Direct observation and scoring by trained data collectors. 29 items (5 dimensions) V2: 38 items Rating based on general knowledge of person and not over a specified time period

Timed and coded ambulation in public nursing home areas

Wandering classified by pattern and rhythm. Pattern = random, lapping, and pacing. Rhythm = cycle of locomotive and nonlocomotive

28-items are times/episode of wandering, e.g., walks between lunch and dinner, walks aimlessly, or bumps into obstacles when walking

Range and interpretation of scores not provided
AWS (V2):10 minutes Residents with dementia in assisted living or nursing home Internal Consistency α=.87 Validity: all but the routinized subscale significantly correlated with staff reports of patient wandering (p<.01)

Table 1. Notes

1 The Behavioral Domain column lists area using the labeling of behaviors as reported within the cited article.

α = Cronbach's alpha
ABID = Agitated Behavior in Dementia Scale
ABS = Aggressive Behavior Scale
ADL = Activities of Daily Living
AES - C = Apathy Evaluation Scale - Clinician
AES - I = Apathy Evaluation Scale - Informant
AES - S = Apathy Evaluation Scale - Self
AES = Apathy Evaluation Scale
AI = Activity Inventory
AWS = Algase Wandering Scale
V2 = version 2
BAI = Beck Anxiety Inventory
BARS = Brief Agitation Rating Scale
BDI = Beck Depression Inventory
BEHAVE-AD = Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease
BRSD = CERAD Behavior Rating Scale for Dementia
BSSD = Behavioral Syndromes Scale for Dementia
CABOS = Computer Assisted Behavioral Observation Systems
CCL - A = Cognition Checklist for Anxiety
CCL - D = Cognition Checklist for Depression
CDR = Clinical Dementia Rating Scale
CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
CMAI = Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory
CMAI = Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory
CSDD = Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia
DAIR = Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating Scale
DASS = Depression Anxiety Stress Scale
DBD = Dementia Behavior Disturbance Scale
DBRS = Disruptive Behavior Rating Scales
DMAS = The Dementia Mood Assessment Scale
DSM-IV = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV
DSS = Dementia Signs and Symptoms Scale
ESS = Epworth Sleepiness Scale
FrSBe = Frontal System Behavioral Scale
GAI = Geriatric Anxiety Inventory
GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale
HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
HAM-A = Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety
HAM-D = Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
HD = Huntington's Disease
IADL = Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
IAS = Irritability Apathy Scale
KBCI = Key Behavior Change Inventory
LARS = Lille Apathy Rating Scale
MCI = Mild Cognitive Impairment
MDS = Minimum Data Set
mMMSE = Modified Mini-Mental Status Exam
MOAS = Modified Overt Aggression Scale
NHBPS = The Nursing Home Behavior Problem Scale
NOISE = Nurse Oriented Scale for Inpatient Evaluation
NOSGER = Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients
NPI = Neuropsychiatric Inventory
NPI-C = Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Clinician
NPI-Q = Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Questionnaire
NRS = The Neuro-behavioral Rating Scale
OAS = Overt Aggression Scale
OASS = Overt Agitation Severity Scale
PANSS = Positive and Negative Symptom Scale
PAS = Pittsburgh Agitation Scale
PD = Parkinson's Disease
PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire - 9
PLUT = Plutchik Scale
PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
RAGE = Rating Scale for Aggressive Behavior in the Elderly
RAID = Rating Anxiety in Dementia
RAS = Ryden Aggression Scale
RMBPC = Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist
SANS = Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms
SDI = The Sleep Disorders Inventory
SF - 20 = 20-item Short Form Survey
TBI = Traumatic Brain Injury

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale not included since generally used to assess psychosis in patients with schizophrenia.

Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) and Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) are not included since primarily used in patients with schizophrenia.

Unified Parkinson's Disease rating scale not included as it is a single item for apathy that does not have any reliability measure.

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale not included because it was first published in 1960 and is no longer considered the gold standard. While it has adequate internal reliability, many of the items do not contribute to depression severity, response options are not optimal ,and the retest reliability is poor. Content validity has also been found to be poor (Bagby, Ryder, Schuller & Marshall, 2004).

The Mini Nutritional Assessment was not included because it does not address behavior. The Nutritional Risk Index and DETERMINE Your Nutritional Health Checklist were not included because they do not address behavior and because validity has not been established.

GDS was not included as at least two studies have found it not to be as reliable and valid in a dementia population as in the general geriatric population (Burke, 1989; Korner, 2006).

CES-D was not included as there was no evidence of reliability and validity in a dementia population.

State/Trait anxiety scale: originally published prior to 1980.

Geriatric Evaluation by Relative's Rating Instrument (GERRI) Schwartz, G. (1983). Development and validation of the Geriatric Evaluation by Relative's Rating Instrument (GERRI). Psychological Reports. 53:479-88-not included because there is no subscale for neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Clinical Assessment of Psychopathology among Elderly Residents (CAPER): Reichenfeld (1992) not included because it does not address specific behaviors of dementia-it is for diagnosis of psychotic disorders. It is also based on psychiatrist interview.


Table 2. Summary of Results from Systematic Review of Behavioral Measures for Use with Dementia Patients (N=44)

back to top
Target Behavior Total Scales Reviewed Scales
Part 1: General Behavior Scales
15 Alzheimer's disease Assessment Scale Non-Cognitive
Multi-Dimensional Observation Scale for Elderly Subjects
Nurses' Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients
The Neurobehavioral Rating Scale
The Nursing Home Behavior Problem Scale
BEHAVE-AD
Neuropsychiatric Inventory
Revised Memory and Behavior Problem Checklist
Computer Assisted Behavioral Observation Scale
Clinical Dementia Rating Scale
Behavioral Syndromes Scale for Dementia
Dementia Signs and Symptoms Scale
CERAD Behavior Rating Scale for Dementia
Key Behavior Change Inventory
Dementia Behavior Disturbances Scale
Part 2: Specific Behavior Scales
A. Agitation 6 Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory
Agitated Behavior in Dementia Scale
Pittsburgh Agitation Scale
Brief Agitation Rating Scale
Overt Agitation Severity Scale
Disruptive Behavior Rating Scales
B. Apathy 6 Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating Scale
Apathy Evaluation Scale
Lille Apathy Rating Scale
Irritability-Apathy Scale
Frontal System Behavior Scale
Apathy Inventory
C. Aggression 4 Aggression Behavior Scale
Overt Aggression Scale
RAGE
Ryden Aggression Scale
D. Depression 3 Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9
The Dementia Mood Assessment Scale
E. Depression & Anxiety 2 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale
F. Anxiety 4 Rating Anxiety in Dementia
Geriatric Anxiety Inventory
Beck Anxiety Inventory
The Worry Scale
G. Sleep 3 Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
The Sleep Disorders Inventory
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
H. Wandering 1 Algase Wandering Scale
back to top

Table 3. Comparison of 44 Behavioral Symptom Scales along Settings, Number of Items and Behavioral Categories Included

back to top
Scale Settings Number of Items Behavioral Categories
NH ALF HOME HOSP None General Agitation Apathy Aggression Depression & Anxiety Sleep Wandering
ADAS X X 10 X
MOSES X 40 X
NOSGER X X X 30 X
NRS X 27 X
NHBPS X 29 X
BEHAVE-AD X X 26 X
NPI X 12 X
RMBPC X 24 X
CABOS X N/A X
CDR X N/A X
BSSD X 24 X
DSS X X 43 X
BRSD X 51 X
KBCI X 64 X
DBD X 28 X
CMAI X X 29 X
ABID X 16 X
PAS X X N/A X
BARS X 10 X
OASS X 12 X
DBRS X 21 X
DAIR X 16 X
AES X 18 X
LARS X 33 X
IAS X 10 X
FrSBe X 46 X
AI X 3 X
ABS X X 4 X
OAS X 4 X
RAGE X 21 X
RAS X X 25 X
CSDD X 19 X
PHQ-9 X 9 X
DMAS X 24 X
HADS X X 14 X
DASS X X 42 X
RAID X X X 20 X
GAI X X 20 X
BAI X 21 X
Worry Scale X 8 X
PSQI X 19 X
SDI X 7 X
ESS X 8 X
AWS X X 29 X
back to top

Table 3. Notes


NH= nursing home

ALF = assisted living facility

None spec = setting not specified by authors

General = broad range of behavioral categories included

Depress/anxiety = includes scales focusing on depression only, anxiety only or depression and anxiety combined

N/A = not applicable or difficult to determine as number of items depends upon clinical decision-making while implementing the assessment

back to top

References

Morandi, A., McCurley, J., Vasilevskis, E., et al. (2012). Tools to detect delirium superimposed on dementia: A systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2012;60:2005-2012.

Wong, C., Holroyd-Leduc, J., Simel, D., et al. Does this patient have delirium? Value of bedside instruments. JAMA. 2010;304:779-786.


inserted by FC2 system